With Nationals now over, Mollie (the blue BSP car,) can now move from daily driver status to a BSP car. With that being the case, let's start with where we currently are.
The car is a 2016 Mazda MX-5 Miata with the GT package. This is the top of the line package with leather interior, Bose sound system, blind spot monitoring, lane departure warning, automatic headlights, rain sensing wipers, etc.
I had already done a number of modifications to move the car in the right direction. It has Dynamic coilovers with Swift Springs in 728/448 F/R rates, a Mazda Motorsports front speedway style swaybar with 0.188 wall thickness set in the middle, Flyin Miata Little Big Brake kit, AVO short tube header, Goodwin Racing midpipe, Goodwin Racing Super Q for Header muffler, and a Ecutek tune. So the car basically has a very similar build to my STR car, although some of the lightening such as seats, battery, etc. had not yet been done.
To start the build, I decided it would be good to document the starting weight. Pics below, but the car is starting with 15,809 miles and a little over a 1/4 tank of gas. The starting weight is 2278 with the stock BBS wheels and 205/45/17 Bridgestone tires from my STR car.
So, now the rest of the build can start. First up will be some weight reductions, mostly in the way of stereo removal, seatbelt removal, race seat swap, and 15x11 949 Racing wheels with 275/35/15 Hoosier tires.
More to come.
Saturday, September 16, 2017
Monday, September 11, 2017
List of things to do
This will be far from a conclusive list, but I wanted to start posting a to do list while reading through the rules. Some of these items have already been done, but I will try to document them where I can.
- Remove stock seat belts
- Swap stock seats for race seats from STR car (25 pounds each, minus seat belt receivers)
- Swap stock steering wheel for race wheel with quick release
- Add front splitter
- Add rear spoiler
- Remove stock stereo, Bose components, CD player, XM components, and speakers (make plates for resulting holes)
- Remove "fog" lights and replace with brake ducts
- Remove rear view mirror
- Remove lane departure camera (per update/backdate)
- Remove rain sensing wiper assembly (per update/backdate)
- Remove visors?
- Add 15x11 wheels and 275/35/15 Hoosiers to start (update to 15x12 and 295/30/15 Hoosiers when available)
- Add flares to cover wheels/tires
- Replace wheel studs with ARP extended studs
- Replace stock lugnuts with 949 Racing aluminum lugnuts
- Replace stock shocks/springs with Dynamic coilovers and Swift springs. Starting springs rates to be 728/448 F/R
- Replace stock brake calipers with Flyin Miata Little Big Brake Kit
- Add Pagid pads from Mazda Motorsports
- Replace stock front rotors with 2 piece rotors from Karcepts
- Add air ducts for brakes
- Replace stock front swaybar with Mazda Motorsports speedway style bar
- Replace stock rear swaybar with Mazda Motorsports rear bar
- Add offset bushings to front suspension to get 3+ degrees of negative camber
- Replace other suspension bushings with Delrin
- Replace rear differential mount with JBR mount (per reliability/durability rule)
- Replace stock battery with Battery Tender BTL35A480C Lithium Iron Phosphate battery
- Replace stock exhaust with AVO header, Goodwin midpipe (replace converter with a resonator?,) and Fujitsubo muffler
- Research replacing stock motor mounts
- Replace stock flywheel with Fidanza aluminum flywheel (research getting "race" clutch made)
- Replace stock differential with differential from automatic for better gearing
- Add Cusco LSD to automatic differential (supposedly the same as the Fiat unit)
- Remove A/C? (Need to find alternate idler pulley or shorter belt)
- Research alternate pulleys for engine
- Remove plastic upper engine shield
- Install Mazda Motorsports oil cooler
ND for BSP
I'll get into more detail soon, but wanted to get this information out there.
For those unaware, I've been working with Mazda Motorsports for the past two years on developing parts for the ND Miata (2016+ Mazda MX-5.) The development started with parts for CS and then quickly moved to parts for STR. The past two seasons have been spent developing the STR car, and our results have been quite good, with a 4th place and 5th place at the National Championships. While I would love to keep running in STR and going for the Championship, the plan from the start was to move from STR to BSP and then DP. So, after competing at the National Championships this past week with my STR ND and finishing in 5th place out of 77, it's now time to move on to building the BSP car.
Because of my work with Mazda Motorsports, a good portion of the STR build was documented in articles on their website. Here is a link to those articles: https://www.mazdamotorsports.com/?s=ron+bauer .
At the National Championships, I spoke with a number of people that expressed that they had been watching the start of my BSP build through Facebook. I even talked to a few people that weren't in Miatas that told me they had enjoyed my previous build information on the Jalapeno (my 2011 Mazda MX-5 for DP,) on this site. This was humbling and cool at the same point.
So, I've decided to document the BSP and DP builds of the ND on here as well. I'll still continue to write articles for Mazda Motorsports, but the nuts and bolts of the build will be further in depth here. Please feel free to contact me with any questions, either through here, or through Facebook on either my personal page or my Bauerspeed Racing page. I also am on Twitter at @Bauerspeed.
More to come. First up, documenting what can be easily done under the Street Prepared ruleset.
For those unaware, I've been working with Mazda Motorsports for the past two years on developing parts for the ND Miata (2016+ Mazda MX-5.) The development started with parts for CS and then quickly moved to parts for STR. The past two seasons have been spent developing the STR car, and our results have been quite good, with a 4th place and 5th place at the National Championships. While I would love to keep running in STR and going for the Championship, the plan from the start was to move from STR to BSP and then DP. So, after competing at the National Championships this past week with my STR ND and finishing in 5th place out of 77, it's now time to move on to building the BSP car.
Because of my work with Mazda Motorsports, a good portion of the STR build was documented in articles on their website. Here is a link to those articles: https://www.mazdamotorsports.com/?s=ron+bauer .
At the National Championships, I spoke with a number of people that expressed that they had been watching the start of my BSP build through Facebook. I even talked to a few people that weren't in Miatas that told me they had enjoyed my previous build information on the Jalapeno (my 2011 Mazda MX-5 for DP,) on this site. This was humbling and cool at the same point.
So, I've decided to document the BSP and DP builds of the ND on here as well. I'll still continue to write articles for Mazda Motorsports, but the nuts and bolts of the build will be further in depth here. Please feel free to contact me with any questions, either through here, or through Facebook on either my personal page or my Bauerspeed Racing page. I also am on Twitter at @Bauerspeed.
More to come. First up, documenting what can be easily done under the Street Prepared ruleset.
Sunday, December 27, 2015
Jalapeno is for sale!
Many will be surprised by this. Heck, I'm even a little surprised that I've decided to do this!
Bruiser, aka The Jalapeno is for sale. 2011 Mazda MX-5 built for SCCA autocross in DP.
Let me start by saying that I believe cars should be driven. I've made the decision for various reasons to run our new car in STR next year and have been agonizing over what that means for the Jalapeno. While I could run him occasionally, or take him to track days, I feel like he would be sitting doing nothing more than I would like. Add to that the fact that we've got 2 sets of tires that only have Nationals on them along with another full set of brand new tires, and it's a waste for him to only run a little bit.
I have put a LOT, both financially and personally into building this car. It has been a work of love and the car is an absolute hoot to drive. It competes for TTOD at a lot of events and in the 5 years I've been running it, I've won a National Championship and taking 2nd at the other 4 National Championships.
It starts right up, is very reliable, and easy to drive.
Below is some information on what would come with the car. I'm sure there is plenty more that I've temporarily forgotten.
The car is not street legal, and would come with a bill of sale only (that's the way I bought it.) I'm keeping our enclosed trailer, so you'll need your own trailer (though I'd happily deliver the car locally.) Car is located in Seattle.
Asking $25k - I can be reached at bauerspeed@gmail.com
2070 lb minimum weight - Weighs under 2000 pounds without ballast
Aluminum hood and trunk lid
Custom paint
Carbon fiber doors
OMP WRC Carbon carbon fiber seat
Momo Monte Carlo steering wheel
Snap Off quick release
Full cage - Goes to front and rear shock towers
“Pro built” engine (aggressive cams, lightweight crank, custom pistons, etc)
AST double adjustable shocks/coilovers
Speedway style front swaybar
Eibach rear swaybar
Polyurethane bushings throughout (engine, suspension, differential, etc)
Megan Racing adjustable toe and camber links (rear suspension)
2 sets of REAL Racing Wheels 16x10 wheels
2 sets of tires with only Nationals runs on them plus 4 new tires (Hoosier R75A - 23.5x11x16) (close to $5k in tires alone with the wets!)
1 set of TR Motorsports 17x9 wheels with 275/40/17 Kumho W710 rain tires
5 speed transmission
OS Giken differential with custom 4.44 ring and pinion professionally built
2 rear spoilers - 1 maximum legal height for DP and 1 lower for track use
Front splitter - maximum legal for DP
Wilwood/Flyin Miata “Little Big Brake Kit” on all 4 wheels
MX-5 Cup brake duct inlets with ducting to front wheels
Ecutek tune from Moto East set for E85
MX-5 Speedsport SL1 carbon/carbon clutch and flywheel - 16 pounds total (super easy to use)
Moto-East intake
Full Goodwin Racing header/midpipe/muffler (Muffler is full size, will pass sound anywhere)
Full size battery in right rear for balance/ballast
Custom wiring using all factory wiring (colors all match wiring diagrams for easy diagnosing)
AWR urethane engine mounts
Deatschwerks fuel injectors and fuel pump
Emissions fully bypassed (block off plates, catch can, etc)
5 point harness
Spare stock engine
2 extra transmissions (both need to be rebuilt)
Various spares
Bruiser, aka The Jalapeno is for sale. 2011 Mazda MX-5 built for SCCA autocross in DP.
Let me start by saying that I believe cars should be driven. I've made the decision for various reasons to run our new car in STR next year and have been agonizing over what that means for the Jalapeno. While I could run him occasionally, or take him to track days, I feel like he would be sitting doing nothing more than I would like. Add to that the fact that we've got 2 sets of tires that only have Nationals on them along with another full set of brand new tires, and it's a waste for him to only run a little bit.
I have put a LOT, both financially and personally into building this car. It has been a work of love and the car is an absolute hoot to drive. It competes for TTOD at a lot of events and in the 5 years I've been running it, I've won a National Championship and taking 2nd at the other 4 National Championships.
It starts right up, is very reliable, and easy to drive.
Below is some information on what would come with the car. I'm sure there is plenty more that I've temporarily forgotten.
The car is not street legal, and would come with a bill of sale only (that's the way I bought it.) I'm keeping our enclosed trailer, so you'll need your own trailer (though I'd happily deliver the car locally.) Car is located in Seattle.
Asking $25k - I can be reached at bauerspeed@gmail.com
2070 lb minimum weight - Weighs under 2000 pounds without ballast
Aluminum hood and trunk lid
Custom paint
Carbon fiber doors
OMP WRC Carbon carbon fiber seat
Momo Monte Carlo steering wheel
Snap Off quick release
Full cage - Goes to front and rear shock towers
“Pro built” engine (aggressive cams, lightweight crank, custom pistons, etc)
AST double adjustable shocks/coilovers
Speedway style front swaybar
Eibach rear swaybar
Polyurethane bushings throughout (engine, suspension, differential, etc)
Megan Racing adjustable toe and camber links (rear suspension)
2 sets of REAL Racing Wheels 16x10 wheels
2 sets of tires with only Nationals runs on them plus 4 new tires (Hoosier R75A - 23.5x11x16) (close to $5k in tires alone with the wets!)
1 set of TR Motorsports 17x9 wheels with 275/40/17 Kumho W710 rain tires
5 speed transmission
OS Giken differential with custom 4.44 ring and pinion professionally built
2 rear spoilers - 1 maximum legal height for DP and 1 lower for track use
Front splitter - maximum legal for DP
Wilwood/Flyin Miata “Little Big Brake Kit” on all 4 wheels
MX-5 Cup brake duct inlets with ducting to front wheels
Ecutek tune from Moto East set for E85
MX-5 Speedsport SL1 carbon/carbon clutch and flywheel - 16 pounds total (super easy to use)
Moto-East intake
Full Goodwin Racing header/midpipe/muffler (Muffler is full size, will pass sound anywhere)
Full size battery in right rear for balance/ballast
Custom wiring using all factory wiring (colors all match wiring diagrams for easy diagnosing)
AWR urethane engine mounts
Deatschwerks fuel injectors and fuel pump
Emissions fully bypassed (block off plates, catch can, etc)
5 point harness
Spare stock engine
2 extra transmissions (both need to be rebuilt)
Various spares
Sunday, April 7, 2013
Moving weight
Finding time to work on the car seems to be easier than finding time to update the blog, so unfortunately, things sometimes end up out of order on the blog. This is one of those.
While waiting on the engine build, I had decided that one of the things I wanted to do was to try to move some weight off of the nose of the car and try to relocate it to the passenger side and as far rear as possible.
Thoughts of things to do included:
- Replace the front bumper support with something lighter
- Move the fuse box and ECU from the driver's side front rail into the passenger floorboard area
- Relocate the battery from the passenger firewall area inside the engine bay to the passenger rear trunk area
- Relocate coolant reservoir
After pulling the front bumper cover off and taking a look at the bumper support again, I realized that it already had a lot of holes cut into it, so it really would require replacing it with something more custom. Additionally, we originally had planned to make a trip down to Mazda Raceway-Laguna Seca for a big Miata event. Since I would be running the car on the track, I decided that having the additional crash protection was worthwhile. So, that idea is currently on hold.
Also on hold is the relocation of the coolant reservoir. It would be of some benefit, but I'm currently unsure of the venting needs, as well as the fact that it would require finding a lot of custom hoses to do it.
That left relocating the fuse box, ECU, and battery.
The fuse box and ECU come from the factory sitting on the driver's side frame rail and the cross member between the two rails that is located in front of the engine.
Again, by having an additional engine harness, it was as "simple" as matching up the wires. Of course, it wasn't really "simple." There are a LOT of wires in the current generation cars. The great thing about that is the ability to use the factory ECU on crazy builds.
The amount of time spent thinking about routing things, cutting, splicing, etc. was rather insane really, but in the end it would be worthwhile. Ultimately, there probably isn't a wire in the car that I haven't cut and either shortened or lengthened. I'm proud to say that everything is correctly color coded, so if I ever have a problem, I can use the factory wiring diagrams to determine which wires I need to find.
I used non-insulated terminals to splice the wires together and colored heat shrink tubing. Some of the major car manufacturers have gone to using terminals instead of solder. Not only is it easier, but it arguably creates stronger connections. By using color-coded heat shrink tubing, it keeps things weather resistant, as well as again, keeping factory color coding throughout the wire.
Most of the wires were routed through the hole that previously held the heater core connections on the passenger side firewall. Below is the view from the engine compartment and then from inside the car after all was done.
The only remaining wires that now went through the driver's side hole were for the starter and brake fluid reservoir. Again, as on the passenger side, I used aluminum sheet to plug the hole, with grommets surrounding the wiring looms.
And the finished product inside the passenger compartment.
The wiring is placed such that a passenger seat could still be run in the car. The passenger obviously would need to be careful with their foot placement. ;-)
Now for the battery move. We had been running a small Odyssey battery on a little shelf in the engine compartment tucked up against the firewall on the passenger side.
This was already a relocation, as the factory placement was on the cross member between the two frame rails. It had required extending the positive cable and running the negative to the engine.
Since we had been dealing with a slow drain on the battery, I decided that in addition to moving the battery to the rear passenger corner of the trunk, I would also go back to a full size battery. We have to add weight to the car anyway to meet the minimum weight requirement, so why not put some extra weight where it's needed most?
To additionally combat the battery drain, I picked up a heavy duty, high amp 4 pole battery kill switch. The alternator in newer cars has to put out a lot more amperage to run everything, and the old-school switches weren't rated to handle this.
This relocation would require an even longer positive battery cable, so I ordered up some bulk wire, and then soldered on the ends to put everything at the exact lengths I wanted them.
I was able to re-use the factory lower battery box to mount the battery in the car which made for a fairly simple mounting. The new ground wire goes to the old jack mount. As extra insurance, I bought a braided ground wire and connected that between the engine and the firewall to make sure everything was properly grounded.
Not the best picture, but this is the finished product. I also installed a Battery Tender harness for ease of keeping the car charged up.
And finally, a shot of the engine compartment showing how much cleaner the front end looks. I'll be mounting the remote reservoirs for the shocks on the frame rails very soon.
While waiting on the engine build, I had decided that one of the things I wanted to do was to try to move some weight off of the nose of the car and try to relocate it to the passenger side and as far rear as possible.
Thoughts of things to do included:
- Replace the front bumper support with something lighter
- Move the fuse box and ECU from the driver's side front rail into the passenger floorboard area
- Relocate the battery from the passenger firewall area inside the engine bay to the passenger rear trunk area
- Relocate coolant reservoir
After pulling the front bumper cover off and taking a look at the bumper support again, I realized that it already had a lot of holes cut into it, so it really would require replacing it with something more custom. Additionally, we originally had planned to make a trip down to Mazda Raceway-Laguna Seca for a big Miata event. Since I would be running the car on the track, I decided that having the additional crash protection was worthwhile. So, that idea is currently on hold.
Also on hold is the relocation of the coolant reservoir. It would be of some benefit, but I'm currently unsure of the venting needs, as well as the fact that it would require finding a lot of custom hoses to do it.
That left relocating the fuse box, ECU, and battery.
The fuse box and ECU come from the factory sitting on the driver's side frame rail and the cross member between the two rails that is located in front of the engine.
The ECU is on the left with multitude of wires going into two plugs, while the fuse box is the white base with black top.
The picture shows the ECU with a metal cover on it that would be going away. It was more of a protective piece as the factory airbox used to sit on top of it. The ECU and mount only weigh around 2 pounds, while the fuse box without any of the wiring or actual fuse panels weighs around a pound. So, between the two, it's not a lot of weight to relocate, but by the time you add in all the wiring, etc. it is an improvement. Again, it is moving it from the front, driver's side to the passenger floorboard.
Of course nothing is ever simple, and this is probably one of the most challenging things I've done to the car. Reason being that it's not as simple as just moving the two items out of the engine bay onto the passenger floorboard. The wiring is really the hard part.
Of note, I did all of this prior to removing the old engine out of the car. I wanted to make sure that the car still ran correctly after the re-wiring and before putting the new built motor in the car.
Most of the wiring that came from these two items entered the passenger compartment in the driver footwell area. This wiring then went to the gauge cluster, the pedals, fuel tank, etc. So, with the relocation, a number of these wires would be able to be shortened. However, the engine harness itself would need a lot of wires lengthened. The easiest way to extend the engine harness would be to purchase an additional harness and use it. This would allow all the wiring to remain the same throughout the car. In order to place the ECU and fusebox where I wanted, it would require running the engine harness along the firewall inside the engine compartment instead of inside the passenger compartment. Not a major change, but it did allow the use of almost two feet less wiring than would have been required to run it inside the passenger compartment.
Again, by having an additional engine harness, it was as "simple" as matching up the wires. Of course, it wasn't really "simple." There are a LOT of wires in the current generation cars. The great thing about that is the ability to use the factory ECU on crazy builds.
The amount of time spent thinking about routing things, cutting, splicing, etc. was rather insane really, but in the end it would be worthwhile. Ultimately, there probably isn't a wire in the car that I haven't cut and either shortened or lengthened. I'm proud to say that everything is correctly color coded, so if I ever have a problem, I can use the factory wiring diagrams to determine which wires I need to find.
I used non-insulated terminals to splice the wires together and colored heat shrink tubing. Some of the major car manufacturers have gone to using terminals instead of solder. Not only is it easier, but it arguably creates stronger connections. By using color-coded heat shrink tubing, it keeps things weather resistant, as well as again, keeping factory color coding throughout the wire.
Most of the wires were routed through the hole that previously held the heater core connections on the passenger side firewall. Below is the view from the engine compartment and then from inside the car after all was done.
The only remaining wires that now went through the driver's side hole were for the starter and brake fluid reservoir. Again, as on the passenger side, I used aluminum sheet to plug the hole, with grommets surrounding the wiring looms.
And the finished product inside the passenger compartment.
The wiring is placed such that a passenger seat could still be run in the car. The passenger obviously would need to be careful with their foot placement. ;-)
Now for the battery move. We had been running a small Odyssey battery on a little shelf in the engine compartment tucked up against the firewall on the passenger side.
This was already a relocation, as the factory placement was on the cross member between the two frame rails. It had required extending the positive cable and running the negative to the engine.
Since we had been dealing with a slow drain on the battery, I decided that in addition to moving the battery to the rear passenger corner of the trunk, I would also go back to a full size battery. We have to add weight to the car anyway to meet the minimum weight requirement, so why not put some extra weight where it's needed most?
To additionally combat the battery drain, I picked up a heavy duty, high amp 4 pole battery kill switch. The alternator in newer cars has to put out a lot more amperage to run everything, and the old-school switches weren't rated to handle this.
This relocation would require an even longer positive battery cable, so I ordered up some bulk wire, and then soldered on the ends to put everything at the exact lengths I wanted them.
I was able to re-use the factory lower battery box to mount the battery in the car which made for a fairly simple mounting. The new ground wire goes to the old jack mount. As extra insurance, I bought a braided ground wire and connected that between the engine and the firewall to make sure everything was properly grounded.
Not the best picture, but this is the finished product. I also installed a Battery Tender harness for ease of keeping the car charged up.
And finally, a shot of the engine compartment showing how much cleaner the front end looks. I'll be mounting the remote reservoirs for the shocks on the frame rails very soon.
Monday, March 18, 2013
The new engine is in and running
The blocking plates showed up the day after the last post, so I was able to install those and get started on the engine installation over the weekend.
This is the blockoff for the EGR valve on the back of the head. Below is where the valve was located.
The tube that went from the head to the intake nanifold had to also go away, so here is the plug for the hole in the head.
And the plug for the intake manifold side. I did cut off some of the extra tubing that went into the manifold (the longer part on the right.)

The EGR valve also had a water line going to it, so that also got capped off.
I thought I had a good picture of the blocking plate for the PCV valve on the side of the engine between the head and block, but can't find it now. In any case, it is a beautifully machined piece similar to the EGR valve blocking plate, but larger.
By getting rid of that valve, we'll no longer have oils, etc. going into the intake and through the throttle body. So we'll now have much cleaner intake tract. This also allowed us to get rid of the hose that went between the valve cover and the intake. I will be putting a catch can in place to take care of the bad stuff coming from the valve cover, and then on the intake side, I purchased a cap to go over the inlet into the intake.
While I was installing the new engine, I decided it was time to upgrade the motor mounts, so I ordered up a set of AWR mounts. These feature 95 durometer polyurethane, and should stiffen up the drivetrain quite a bit.
I also chose to replace the major coolant hoses while everything was being cleaned up/replaced. Big thanks as usual goes out to Mazda Motorsports here, as they got these to us quickly and now the engine compartment looks incredible.So, a little more about the engine. The rules in DP allow a lot to be done, so the motor has new cams, forged pistons with the allowed overbore, a forged crank, and updated just about everything else.
The break-in procedure for the new engine is to start it, let it run for a minute, then do 20 minutes at 2000 rpm. Let the engine cool, and repeat twice more. Tonight started the first of these sessions, as our break-in oil from Maxima finally arrived. Between the more aggressive cams and the much stiffer motor mounts, the car sure does vibrate a lot more!
The first events will be this coming weekend, so we'll report back after that.
Thursday, March 7, 2013
Time for more power!
I'll be documenting things fairly soon here, but after waiting 4 1/2 months, our new fully built motor showed up today. It's been a bit of a struggle getting it, as we were supposed to have it right around Christmas, and here it is now March 6th and it finally got to us.
In any case, it should be a very nice upgrade. We'll get it all installed, do some tuning and take it back to the dyno to confirm what kind of improvement we have ended up with.
We'll be deleting some of the emissions equipment with the install of this new engine, so watch for more information on that. Going bye bye are the PCV valve and system, as well as the EGR system. The engine builder is supplying block off plates/plugs for those systems along with a catch can system.
Also on the agenda is switching over to E85 (in a strict sense of the numbers, it would be 85% ethanol and 15% gas.) For the most part this should be pretty simple as the stock injectors theoretically have enough headroom to flow the higher amount of fuel needed when running E85. That just leaves getting the tuning done for the higher flow. Because E85 burns cooler than straight gas, timing can be run more aggressively without worrying about detonation. It effectively is as if it was a super high octane race gas, but the beauty is that E85 is significantly less expensive.
I'll try to get some good pictures this weekend to post.
In any case, it should be a very nice upgrade. We'll get it all installed, do some tuning and take it back to the dyno to confirm what kind of improvement we have ended up with.
We'll be deleting some of the emissions equipment with the install of this new engine, so watch for more information on that. Going bye bye are the PCV valve and system, as well as the EGR system. The engine builder is supplying block off plates/plugs for those systems along with a catch can system.
Also on the agenda is switching over to E85 (in a strict sense of the numbers, it would be 85% ethanol and 15% gas.) For the most part this should be pretty simple as the stock injectors theoretically have enough headroom to flow the higher amount of fuel needed when running E85. That just leaves getting the tuning done for the higher flow. Because E85 burns cooler than straight gas, timing can be run more aggressively without worrying about detonation. It effectively is as if it was a super high octane race gas, but the beauty is that E85 is significantly less expensive.
I'll try to get some good pictures this weekend to post.
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Changing tires and new partners
An ongoing challenge that we've had with our car is a lack of grip with cold tires.
While we've loved our Hoosier R75 radials when they got hot, it took a bit of work to get them to the right temperature. Not only did we have to fight the lack of grip when outside temperatures were 80+ degrees, but if the outside temperature was cooler, it was even tougher.
As the first driver in the car, Karl Coleman usually spent most of his first run getting heat in the tires. Ron's first runs were then better, but it usually took at least a run from each driver to get the tires working well. The same went for Alyson and Amy on the Ladies side.
Hoosier slicks have a few different compounds, with A25 being the softest, R35 being in the middle, and R45 being the hardest. For autocross purposes, softer is usually better because they work better right out of the box. The potential danger is that they can overheat quickly. Unfortunately for us, there is only one compound available in the size that we ran. The R75 compound is in between the R35 and R45. Although we never had to worry about them overheating, we did have to worry about getting and keeping heat.
The earlier Miatas were starting to switch over to softer compound tires, making them even faster. Jim Daniels in his '94 Miata started running Avons, while Drew Vanderploeg and Steve Hudson made the switch to 110 compound Goodyears.
Our team had been looking in to trying out Goodyears based on the very impressive results of EM driver, Jeff Keisel. However, the cost of their Radial Slicks were extremely high, even when compared to the Hoosiers we were already running. It's hard to spring for a $2000 set of tires not knowing if they'd be faster than what we were already running.
Jeff made the trek up for our National Tour in July, so I took them time to talk to him about the Goodyears. He said that the compound on the radials was way too hard for our autocross purposes and that I should give the bias plies a try.
When building the car, I wanted to keep with newer technology, starting with the car, and following through to the tires. It seemed like a big step backwards to run old technology bias plies when radials were available.
The bottom line, however, was that we needed a softer compound, and the Goodyear 250 compound was softer than our Hoosiers.
Fortunately for us, our friend and multi-time National Champion, Andy McKee had started running these tires on his XP RX-7. He only ran the 23.5x11.5x16 tires on the front of his car, but was willing to part with a used pair for us to test with.
After receiving them, we mounted them up and put them on the front of the car. We didn't make any changes to the car, figuring that we needed to see first if they were at least comparable. The intent initially was to run them in the morning at the first event on the front of the car and then switch them to the back for the afternoon. To our joy, the first run out showed them to be better than the Hoosiers on initial turn in. The car also rotated better overall throughout all of the runs.
Needless to say, we didn't switch them to the back of the car, as that would have been an excercise in futility with the front washing out everywhere.
We were able to continue running the tires with quick turnover allowing us to test with lots of heat in the tires, and they didn't seem to lose grip due to overheating when compared to the harder compound Hoosiers.
This made the decision easy to switch from the Hoosiers to the Goodyears.
What needed to happen next though, is that we had to change the setup of the car to match what bias plies like. While we were able to use as much camber as we could for the Hoosier Radial Slicks, bias plies like very little camber.
This left us with a little worry, as the rear suspension gains camber as the car is lowered. We obviously didn't want to add ride height. We took the car to our partners at Clarks Wheel Alignment and they aligned the car for us. As expected, they were able to get the front to the numbers we were looking for, but the minimum amount of camber they could get out of the rear was over 2.5 degress of negative. We were looking for 1 to 1.5 degress, so that left us in a pickle. To add to the problem, even if we could get less camber, we would end up with the toe way outside of the specs we wanted.
The rear of the MX-5 has a multi-link set up, with five different links comprising the suspension. One link is specifically for camber, while another is for toe. These links are non-adjustable, using cams to to change the effective lengths.
So, the obvious choice was to get different length links for the toe and camber. Unfortunately, no one was offering different links for the MX-5. We did find a couple of companies that offered adjustable links for the RX-8, which is very similar to the MX-5.
One of those companies was Megan Racing. Megan Racing specializes in suspension, exhaust, and brake components for a number of performance cars.
They offer all five links with adjustable ends and spherical bearings for the RX-8. We contacted them to see if they had tested these on the MX-5 and were told that they hadn't. We offered to test the toe and camber links on our car, so they sent them off to us.
Upon opening the boxes, our first reaction was that they were very high quality, with a beautiful blue powder coating. They looked plenty strong, being more robust than the stock links. The arms are also adjustable on the car, without disconnecting anything. These guys at Megan Racing were great to deal with and have great products.
Our starting point on alignment is -2.2 degrees of camber with 0.06 degrees of toe-out in the front, and -1.5 degrees of camber with 0.06 degrees of toe-in in the rear. We will probably look at going even less on the camber based on the current wear.
While we've loved our Hoosier R75 radials when they got hot, it took a bit of work to get them to the right temperature. Not only did we have to fight the lack of grip when outside temperatures were 80+ degrees, but if the outside temperature was cooler, it was even tougher.
As the first driver in the car, Karl Coleman usually spent most of his first run getting heat in the tires. Ron's first runs were then better, but it usually took at least a run from each driver to get the tires working well. The same went for Alyson and Amy on the Ladies side.
Hoosier slicks have a few different compounds, with A25 being the softest, R35 being in the middle, and R45 being the hardest. For autocross purposes, softer is usually better because they work better right out of the box. The potential danger is that they can overheat quickly. Unfortunately for us, there is only one compound available in the size that we ran. The R75 compound is in between the R35 and R45. Although we never had to worry about them overheating, we did have to worry about getting and keeping heat.
The earlier Miatas were starting to switch over to softer compound tires, making them even faster. Jim Daniels in his '94 Miata started running Avons, while Drew Vanderploeg and Steve Hudson made the switch to 110 compound Goodyears.
Our team had been looking in to trying out Goodyears based on the very impressive results of EM driver, Jeff Keisel. However, the cost of their Radial Slicks were extremely high, even when compared to the Hoosiers we were already running. It's hard to spring for a $2000 set of tires not knowing if they'd be faster than what we were already running.
Jeff made the trek up for our National Tour in July, so I took them time to talk to him about the Goodyears. He said that the compound on the radials was way too hard for our autocross purposes and that I should give the bias plies a try.
When building the car, I wanted to keep with newer technology, starting with the car, and following through to the tires. It seemed like a big step backwards to run old technology bias plies when radials were available.
The bottom line, however, was that we needed a softer compound, and the Goodyear 250 compound was softer than our Hoosiers.
Fortunately for us, our friend and multi-time National Champion, Andy McKee had started running these tires on his XP RX-7. He only ran the 23.5x11.5x16 tires on the front of his car, but was willing to part with a used pair for us to test with.
After receiving them, we mounted them up and put them on the front of the car. We didn't make any changes to the car, figuring that we needed to see first if they were at least comparable. The intent initially was to run them in the morning at the first event on the front of the car and then switch them to the back for the afternoon. To our joy, the first run out showed them to be better than the Hoosiers on initial turn in. The car also rotated better overall throughout all of the runs.
Needless to say, we didn't switch them to the back of the car, as that would have been an excercise in futility with the front washing out everywhere.
We were able to continue running the tires with quick turnover allowing us to test with lots of heat in the tires, and they didn't seem to lose grip due to overheating when compared to the harder compound Hoosiers.
This made the decision easy to switch from the Hoosiers to the Goodyears.
What needed to happen next though, is that we had to change the setup of the car to match what bias plies like. While we were able to use as much camber as we could for the Hoosier Radial Slicks, bias plies like very little camber.
This left us with a little worry, as the rear suspension gains camber as the car is lowered. We obviously didn't want to add ride height. We took the car to our partners at Clarks Wheel Alignment and they aligned the car for us. As expected, they were able to get the front to the numbers we were looking for, but the minimum amount of camber they could get out of the rear was over 2.5 degress of negative. We were looking for 1 to 1.5 degress, so that left us in a pickle. To add to the problem, even if we could get less camber, we would end up with the toe way outside of the specs we wanted.
The rear of the MX-5 has a multi-link set up, with five different links comprising the suspension. One link is specifically for camber, while another is for toe. These links are non-adjustable, using cams to to change the effective lengths.
So, the obvious choice was to get different length links for the toe and camber. Unfortunately, no one was offering different links for the MX-5. We did find a couple of companies that offered adjustable links for the RX-8, which is very similar to the MX-5.
One of those companies was Megan Racing. Megan Racing specializes in suspension, exhaust, and brake components for a number of performance cars.
They offer all five links with adjustable ends and spherical bearings for the RX-8. We contacted them to see if they had tested these on the MX-5 and were told that they hadn't. We offered to test the toe and camber links on our car, so they sent them off to us.
Upon opening the boxes, our first reaction was that they were very high quality, with a beautiful blue powder coating. They looked plenty strong, being more robust than the stock links. The arms are also adjustable on the car, without disconnecting anything. These guys at Megan Racing were great to deal with and have great products.
Comparison of stock toe link to the Megan Racing link, part number MZ-1470
Comparison of stock rear link to the Megan Racing link, part number MZ-1410
Upon Comparison to the stock arms, it appeared that both would work, although the camber link had a shorter stud on the heim joint that goes into the rear hub. We mounted them up, and while we would prefer a longer stud, everything fit well. Installation was simple, as it was a simple unbolting of the stock links and bolting the new links back in after adjusting the lengths to be close to the stock arm length. Megan Racing is working on a camber link specifically for the MX-5 with a longer stud.
Rear camber link
Rear toe link
The adjustments on these links allowed us to set them close and then fine tune with the stock cams used on the stock links. Upon taking the car back to our friends at Omni, we were happy to see that these new links allowed us plenty of room to get our alignment specs where we wanted.Our starting point on alignment is -2.2 degrees of camber with 0.06 degrees of toe-out in the front, and -1.5 degrees of camber with 0.06 degrees of toe-in in the rear. We will probably look at going even less on the camber based on the current wear.
Sunday, December 9, 2012
New exhaust and rear swaybar
We built our car using a Goodwin Racing exhaust consisting of a short tube header, midpipe (including a small, high-flow cat, and a reasonator,) and muffler.
Always looking for more power to try to even out our power to weight ratio with the earlier cars in the class (remember, we're still running our stock 98,000+ mile motor,) we were excited to hear that PPE Engineering was coming out with a new long tube header setup.
The advantage to the Goodwin header is that it is the same length as the stock header and therefore allows any part of the stock exhaust to be replaced with their higher flow pieces. The downside of course, is that a short tube header is never going to put out as much power as a long tube header.
Since the team had purchased another 2006 MX-5 for a daily driver, it was an easy decision to put this new PPE exhaust on the DP car, as we could move the Goodwin stuff over to the daily driver.
The PPE exhaust came with the new long tube header and a shorter midpipe, which then connected to the Goodwin muffler.
Always looking for more power to try to even out our power to weight ratio with the earlier cars in the class (remember, we're still running our stock 98,000+ mile motor,) we were excited to hear that PPE Engineering was coming out with a new long tube header setup.
The advantage to the Goodwin header is that it is the same length as the stock header and therefore allows any part of the stock exhaust to be replaced with their higher flow pieces. The downside of course, is that a short tube header is never going to put out as much power as a long tube header.
Since the team had purchased another 2006 MX-5 for a daily driver, it was an easy decision to put this new PPE exhaust on the DP car, as we could move the Goodwin stuff over to the daily driver.
The PPE exhaust came with the new long tube header and a shorter midpipe, which then connected to the Goodwin muffler.
A comparison between the Goodwin Racing short tube header (top) and new PPE Long Tube header
While we didn't do any dyno testing between the two units, there were a few independent people that did, and the PPE combo showed an increase across the board.
Secondly, we'd been running the stock rear swaybar since very early on in the development of the car.
Although the car has been working quite well, especially locally, we were looking for more rotation when running on concrete. We don't have any sites locally that run on concrete, but the National Championships in Lincoln, NE are.
So, we ordered up a Racing Beat rear swaybar. It is a 19mm bar vs. the stock 12mm and comes with urethane bushings and two holes for the endlinks to allow for adjustability.
The Sand and Sage club in eastern Washington was holding what will hopefully be an inaugural event in Ellensburg on a concrete pad at Bowers Field at the beginning of May. So, we put the new bar on for a local event at Bremerton Raceway the weekend leading up to the Ellensburg event.
We placed the bar on the softer of the two settings expecting the car to oversteer since we were on asphalt, but to our surprise, the car rotated better than it previously had, but was still very controllable.
When we made the trek to Ellensburg, we placed the bar on the stiffer setting. It worked very well, with us taking the top Pax for the weekend.
Later in the season after running the Nationals Championships on the stiffer setting, we ran a local even on the stiffer setting, and the car still worked better on asphalt..... While the car rotated better at Nationals than the 2011 event, we would still like to have even more stiffness in the rear.
So, we will very likely be looking at an even stiffer rear bar in the future!
New minimum weight for 2012
In the Prepared classes, each car and class have mimimum weight requirements. Most of the classes use similar formulas, but they can vary. In DP, the minimum wieghts are based primarily on displacement. The purpose behind the minimum weights is to try to create parity amongst the different cars in the class.
When we built our car, the formula was as follows:
Engines with displacement less than or equal to 1667cc:
1.10 x displacement (cc)
Engines with displacement greater than 1667cc:
0.95 x displacement (cc) plus 250 lbsIn addition, due to the age of the rules, there was also a weight penalty for cars running wheels wider than 7". In general, many of the cars running in Prepared have been older cars, and thus 7" wheels used to be considered wide. That weight penalty was 75 pounds for wheels up to 10" and 150 pounds for wheels over 10".
Therefore, the formula for our car was:
0.95 x 1999 (displacement) plus 250 lbs, plus an additional 75 lbs for our 10" wide wheels.
Total minimum - 2,225 lbs
As a comparison, our primary competitors in DP are 1.6 L Miatas and 1.8 L Miatas. Their minimum weights were 1,758 lbs and 1998 lbs, respectively. So, there was a 240 pound difference between the two earlier Miatas, and then another jump of 227 pounds to us.
Prepared rules allow for pulling a lot of weight out of the car since these are effectively full on race cars. Unfortunately, a bone stock MX-5 comes from the factory weighing a published 2,441 pounds. And, in fact, our previous CSP MX-5 weighed only about 2,320 pounds.
We obviously took advantage of the weight reduction rules when building the car, and ultimately had to add back about 225 pounds to the car to reach the minimum weight requirement. The nice thing was that for local events, we were able to run with a passenger in the car and be at our minimum. For big events, we had plates of steel that we put in place of the passenger seat. We got these steel plates from our sponsor, Where2Race. They were coated in rubber for moisture protection/rust prevention. Due to their size, we were able to place the front of them on the support rail that the front of the seat bolts go into, and then drill holes through the plates to use the factory rear seat mounts. We then used some 1 1/2" steel strapping between the front and rear seat mounting points to hold the weight securely in place.
By using the factory mounting holes for the seat, we were able to make it a fairly easy change between local events and big events.
Fast forward to the winter of 2011/2012, and a change in the minimum weight calculations. Since pretty much everyone in the class had to add weight to the car to reach the minimums, the SEB (Solo Events Board) made a change to the minimum weight calculations for DP.
The new formula is as follows:
Engines with displacement less than or equal to 1667cc:
1.06 x displacement (cc)
Engines with displacement greater than 1667cc:0.91 x displacement (cc) plus 250 lbs
Of additional importance, is that the 75 weight penalty for up to 10" wide wheels went away. For us, that changed our minimum weight to the following:
0.91 x 1999 (displacement) + 250 lbs, for a total of 2,070 lbs.
This change allowed us to shed 155 lbs for the 2012 season. Since we were using either steel plates or a passenger for approximately 225 pounds of add-on weight already, this was an easy change to make, as we only needed to reduce how many steel plates we had in the car for National level events.
The finished product with the steel plates firmly in place for the 2012 season.
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Adding flares
Sometimes when building a car, things get done slightly out of the order of what would otherwise be preferred.
In the case of the Bauerspeed Racing MX-5, one of those items was the cutting of the fenders and addition of flares. Preferably, this would have been done prior to getting the car painted.
To be fair, the flares that we ended up putting on the car weren't available at the time that the initial work was being done, but we did end up getting lucky with the tires not having extreme rubbing issues with the otherwise stock bodywork. Of course, part of the reason for this was the ride height that we were at.
While we had experience previously with running wide 285/30/18 tires on 18x9.5" wheels on our CSP MX-5 without cutting the fenders/quarter panels, the shorter, wider 23.5x11x16 tires on 16x10" wheels that we run on the DP car were going to be different. Since the tires are an inch smaller in overall diameter, that meant that the DP car would be lower, which would affect offsets, etc.
So, as it turned out, we were able to run the car with just an extreme rolling of the fenders and quarter panels. However, the car was not nearly as low as we would like it. To get it to the height that we wanted, it would require cutting the fenders to allow the needed wheel/tire clearance.
As you know if you've been following the build, we are VERY proud of our body and paint work on the car, so cutting the fenders would detract from the beauty of the car, as it would be very difficult to make the lines look right. In addition to that, there is always the danger of messing up the paint with the actual cutting.
Enter the SEMA show and a one off, special edition MX-5 that Mazda brought. The "Super 20" had flares that not only looked like they would allow the extra clearance needed to cover our big tires, but would hide whatever cutting of the stock fenders would be needed.
Sounds great, but the problem was that these flares were also one-offs. Fortunately there was a great enough clamoring amongst MX-5 owners, that Goodwin Racing was able to get the okay to have these flares built for sale.
The flares were built from fiberglass at the time that we bought them, although they are now available in urethane. Timing of course is everything, and were we to do it again, we'd definitely order them in urethane for a couple of reasons. First of all, they are more flexible (below you will see why this is important,) and secondly they would be more sturdy/less breakable.
We were able to see pictures from another owner that bought these for his daily driver and noted that there were a couple of negatives to the flares. It turns out that the flares were really more of a cosmetic item as built. The attachment to the car was by double stick tape both on the body of the car, and on the inside of the stock fender lip. We had already rolled the stock fenders, so there would be nothing to attach the flares to inside. Also, this area is where we were looking to gain additional clearance. Secondly, the flares were one piece items. Seems okay, but as the flares are being held to the car with double stick tape, this would make removing the bumpers and side skirts very difficult.
These same pictures did however show us that the flares looked to bring the body lines out far enough to cover our tires if we did some extra work.
So we ordered up a set and mocked them up on the car. As we expected, they did increase the overall width of the body work. Next up would be taking advantage of this extra width.
Okay, enough talking, here are some pics.....
Here is what the flare looked like from the inside prior to cutting along with the intial piece cut off where the fender lip was. Futher trimming would be done later to fine tune the whole thing.
The first picture is of a rear flare and uncut fender, while the second is of a front. As you can see, there was probably a little over an inch at both ends of the car. While it wasn't extreme, keep in mind that this was with the fenders already sporting a very heavy roll/flare with my fender roller.
I used painters tape to allow me a clean cutting area. The second picture shows the actual line being cut on the rear. The tape allowed me to see where I was cutting and also allowed a little extra protection to the paint. I used my Dremel tool with 1 1/2" thin cut discs for the cutting of both the fenders and the flares. They are reinforced discs that allow for fairly precise cutting, and don't wear out excessively fast.
The first picture shows the rear after being cut. As you can see, there are two parts to fender back here. The quarter panel attaches to the inner fender normally at the fender lip. So this required cutting both the outer and inner fenders. I then took my fender roller to the inner fender to help push it up a little more. Fortunately it is fairly flat, so even if the tire hits it, there isn't any damage to the tire. The second picture shows the tire now tucking in under the flare. Both of these pictures are with the shock out to show what would happen under compression. The front fenders were much easier to cut as it is just the one piece fender.
Here you can see the car after the cutting of the fenders, without flares. This gives a good idea of what the clearances are at static ride height. Obviously the car is nowhere near as pretty. The cuts could have been done much better if the flares weren't being put on, but all I needed was clearance, not beauty.
I can't seem to find pictures of the additional work I did to the flares, so I will describe it as best I can.
First of all, I wanted to make sure they were strongly attached to the car. As previously noted, the provided attachment was double stick tape along the tops to the body work, and then inside the fender lip. Since the cutting that was done took away some of the attachment points, I decided to screw the inner portion to the lips down towards the bottom of the car. This required drilling holes in the flares and the lips. I then used rivnuts in the lips so I could screw them in. This was subsequently strengthened with more double stick tape. I used 3M "Super Strength Molding Tape."
Secondly, I decided to cut the flares along the stock mounting points between the bumpers, sideskirts, and body/fenders. This was challenging to match the stock lines due to the curvatures involved. In the end, I used a laser level to line up the stock cuts and then drew lines on the flares which I then cut to match. While the match didn't end up 100% perfect, it is very close.
An unfortunate byproduct of this cutting was that the flares no longer matched up at the cut lines. The reason for this is that the flares needed to be twisted a little to fit tightly against the body work. I could twist them to match up by hand, but it would require some way to hold them together other than my hands.... ;-)
My first attempt used double stick tape attached to 2" by 3/4" metal pieces. I then put these at the seams to hold it all together. This took a couple of tries as the tape didn't stick very well to the flares due to the fibers in the fiberglass. The other downside to this solution was that it didn't help with the reason that the cuts were made in the first place, namely the ability to remove the bumpers.
In the meantime, we took the flares to our friends at Pacific Auto Body. They did an outstanding job painting the flares to match their previous work to the car. The finished product was incredible. However, we still had problems with the double stick tape coming off at our mating points.
In my mind, velcro seemed like an obvious solution, but the problem was that there was a bit of a force needed to get the two sides to match up. Typical velcro wouldn't be strong enough to hold. After looking around and doing some research, I came across something similar to velcro, but much stronger. I purchased it at Radio Shack, and it is called "Superlock Fasteners." It has high strength tape on one side and the other side is bascially a bunch of small plastic mushrooms. When two pieces are mated, they create a very strong connection which is similar to velcro, but much, much stronger. This allowed me to use the same metal pieces from before with one side attached to that. I then attached one piece to each side of the flare. When mated together, the small metal plate, holds the flares together! This solution was used for the front, as I was able to use some additional double stick tape in the rear on the bumper portion of the flare to put it where I wanted. The added benefit to this velcro-like solution is that if the flare gets hit hard enough by a cone, it will just pull the "velcro" apart rather than pulling the tape off of the flare.
In the case of the Bauerspeed Racing MX-5, one of those items was the cutting of the fenders and addition of flares. Preferably, this would have been done prior to getting the car painted.
To be fair, the flares that we ended up putting on the car weren't available at the time that the initial work was being done, but we did end up getting lucky with the tires not having extreme rubbing issues with the otherwise stock bodywork. Of course, part of the reason for this was the ride height that we were at.
While we had experience previously with running wide 285/30/18 tires on 18x9.5" wheels on our CSP MX-5 without cutting the fenders/quarter panels, the shorter, wider 23.5x11x16 tires on 16x10" wheels that we run on the DP car were going to be different. Since the tires are an inch smaller in overall diameter, that meant that the DP car would be lower, which would affect offsets, etc.
So, as it turned out, we were able to run the car with just an extreme rolling of the fenders and quarter panels. However, the car was not nearly as low as we would like it. To get it to the height that we wanted, it would require cutting the fenders to allow the needed wheel/tire clearance.
As you know if you've been following the build, we are VERY proud of our body and paint work on the car, so cutting the fenders would detract from the beauty of the car, as it would be very difficult to make the lines look right. In addition to that, there is always the danger of messing up the paint with the actual cutting.
Enter the SEMA show and a one off, special edition MX-5 that Mazda brought. The "Super 20" had flares that not only looked like they would allow the extra clearance needed to cover our big tires, but would hide whatever cutting of the stock fenders would be needed.
Sounds great, but the problem was that these flares were also one-offs. Fortunately there was a great enough clamoring amongst MX-5 owners, that Goodwin Racing was able to get the okay to have these flares built for sale.
The flares were built from fiberglass at the time that we bought them, although they are now available in urethane. Timing of course is everything, and were we to do it again, we'd definitely order them in urethane for a couple of reasons. First of all, they are more flexible (below you will see why this is important,) and secondly they would be more sturdy/less breakable.
We were able to see pictures from another owner that bought these for his daily driver and noted that there were a couple of negatives to the flares. It turns out that the flares were really more of a cosmetic item as built. The attachment to the car was by double stick tape both on the body of the car, and on the inside of the stock fender lip. We had already rolled the stock fenders, so there would be nothing to attach the flares to inside. Also, this area is where we were looking to gain additional clearance. Secondly, the flares were one piece items. Seems okay, but as the flares are being held to the car with double stick tape, this would make removing the bumpers and side skirts very difficult.
These same pictures did however show us that the flares looked to bring the body lines out far enough to cover our tires if we did some extra work.
So we ordered up a set and mocked them up on the car. As we expected, they did increase the overall width of the body work. Next up would be taking advantage of this extra width.
Okay, enough talking, here are some pics.....
This picture shows why we needed to cut the fenders in order to allow proper tire clearance. Obviously, we couldn't lower the car too much or the tires would start hitting the fenders. This picture is of the rear, but the front was very similar.
The first picture is of a rear flare and uncut fender, while the second is of a front. As you can see, there was probably a little over an inch at both ends of the car. While it wasn't extreme, keep in mind that this was with the fenders already sporting a very heavy roll/flare with my fender roller.
I used painters tape to allow me a clean cutting area. The second picture shows the actual line being cut on the rear. The tape allowed me to see where I was cutting and also allowed a little extra protection to the paint. I used my Dremel tool with 1 1/2" thin cut discs for the cutting of both the fenders and the flares. They are reinforced discs that allow for fairly precise cutting, and don't wear out excessively fast.
The first picture shows the rear after being cut. As you can see, there are two parts to fender back here. The quarter panel attaches to the inner fender normally at the fender lip. So this required cutting both the outer and inner fenders. I then took my fender roller to the inner fender to help push it up a little more. Fortunately it is fairly flat, so even if the tire hits it, there isn't any damage to the tire. The second picture shows the tire now tucking in under the flare. Both of these pictures are with the shock out to show what would happen under compression. The front fenders were much easier to cut as it is just the one piece fender.
Here you can see the car after the cutting of the fenders, without flares. This gives a good idea of what the clearances are at static ride height. Obviously the car is nowhere near as pretty. The cuts could have been done much better if the flares weren't being put on, but all I needed was clearance, not beauty.
I can't seem to find pictures of the additional work I did to the flares, so I will describe it as best I can.
First of all, I wanted to make sure they were strongly attached to the car. As previously noted, the provided attachment was double stick tape along the tops to the body work, and then inside the fender lip. Since the cutting that was done took away some of the attachment points, I decided to screw the inner portion to the lips down towards the bottom of the car. This required drilling holes in the flares and the lips. I then used rivnuts in the lips so I could screw them in. This was subsequently strengthened with more double stick tape. I used 3M "Super Strength Molding Tape."
Secondly, I decided to cut the flares along the stock mounting points between the bumpers, sideskirts, and body/fenders. This was challenging to match the stock lines due to the curvatures involved. In the end, I used a laser level to line up the stock cuts and then drew lines on the flares which I then cut to match. While the match didn't end up 100% perfect, it is very close.
An unfortunate byproduct of this cutting was that the flares no longer matched up at the cut lines. The reason for this is that the flares needed to be twisted a little to fit tightly against the body work. I could twist them to match up by hand, but it would require some way to hold them together other than my hands.... ;-)
My first attempt used double stick tape attached to 2" by 3/4" metal pieces. I then put these at the seams to hold it all together. This took a couple of tries as the tape didn't stick very well to the flares due to the fibers in the fiberglass. The other downside to this solution was that it didn't help with the reason that the cuts were made in the first place, namely the ability to remove the bumpers.
In the meantime, we took the flares to our friends at Pacific Auto Body. They did an outstanding job painting the flares to match their previous work to the car. The finished product was incredible. However, we still had problems with the double stick tape coming off at our mating points.
In my mind, velcro seemed like an obvious solution, but the problem was that there was a bit of a force needed to get the two sides to match up. Typical velcro wouldn't be strong enough to hold. After looking around and doing some research, I came across something similar to velcro, but much stronger. I purchased it at Radio Shack, and it is called "Superlock Fasteners." It has high strength tape on one side and the other side is bascially a bunch of small plastic mushrooms. When two pieces are mated, they create a very strong connection which is similar to velcro, but much, much stronger. This allowed me to use the same metal pieces from before with one side attached to that. I then attached one piece to each side of the flare. When mated together, the small metal plate, holds the flares together! This solution was used for the front, as I was able to use some additional double stick tape in the rear on the bumper portion of the flare to put it where I wanted. The added benefit to this velcro-like solution is that if the flare gets hit hard enough by a cone, it will just pull the "velcro" apart rather than pulling the tape off of the flare.
And here is the car after the flares are attached and painted. Beautiful and very functional.
Thursday, November 22, 2012
Way past due....
As if my last post was a long time in coming, I've now realized that I missed this whole season.
So, now that it's Thanksgiving already (WOW,) and we're in the offseason, it is time to catch up on what's happened both to the car over this past year, as well as Bauerspeed Racing's success over the season.
The team is off to spend the day with the family today, but be looking for new updates very soon.
Here's a small glimpse of what we'll be posting about:
From this past season:
- Adding of flares
- Lowering the car further
- Switching tires
- New partners! - Megan Racing and Clarks Wheel Alignment
- Changing minimum weights
- Corner balancing
- Addition of a second car to the team (really a daily driver, but a good backup)
- Team results - Local events, National Tours/Pro Solos, and National Championship
Things to be done over the off season:
- Further moving around of weight - relocation of fuse box, ECU, and battery - modification to the front bumper support
- Addressing the lack of power(!)
- Adding a front splitter
So, obviously a lot that we need to catch up on. See you soon.
So, now that it's Thanksgiving already (WOW,) and we're in the offseason, it is time to catch up on what's happened both to the car over this past year, as well as Bauerspeed Racing's success over the season.
The team is off to spend the day with the family today, but be looking for new updates very soon.
Here's a small glimpse of what we'll be posting about:
From this past season:
- Adding of flares
- Lowering the car further
- Switching tires
- New partners! - Megan Racing and Clarks Wheel Alignment
- Changing minimum weights
- Corner balancing
- Addition of a second car to the team (really a daily driver, but a good backup)
- Team results - Local events, National Tours/Pro Solos, and National Championship
Things to be done over the off season:
- Further moving around of weight - relocation of fuse box, ECU, and battery - modification to the front bumper support
- Addressing the lack of power(!)
- Adding a front splitter
So, obviously a lot that we need to catch up on. See you soon.
Saturday, December 10, 2011
Updates from throughout the 2011 season
I was on a roll for awhile with updating the blog, but obviously there was a large gap in time between the last post and the 2011 season ending thanks!
As you could tell, the car was in nearly ready status as of the last post, but it was missing at least one major item.... Suspension.
I had ordered up a set of Motons between Christmas and New Years, 2010. Normal lead time was 4-6 weeks, but ultimately that turned into a few months due to work stoppages in Holland where they are built. I finally got to the point where I wasn't willing to wait any longer as the season had already started, so I change my order over to AST.
Since the season was already in full swing, sending the shocks back wasn't an option, as we needed to get the car out and running. So the first step was to get some shorter rear springs and to pull out the helper springs in the front. Pulling out the helper springs in the front allowed me to raise the front about 1/2 to 3/4". As previously noted, there wasn't time to order things, so I was able to source some used 6"x400lb rear springs from local autocrosser, Bob Forsberg. This was good enough to get the car to Fordahl Motorsports for an alignment and make it's first appearance at Oregon Region's May 14th event.
The grand unveiling of the car went quite well, with lots of people excited to see the car, not the least of which was Bauerspeed Racing itself!
Of course, this was to be the first actual shakedown of the car, so while hopes were high, there was also much trepidation. Bauerspeed Racing had previously run an MX-5 in CSP, so we had a good amount of knowledge from that, but that car started as a brand new, off the lot car, so it was a known quantity as far as the running gear itself. In addition, while we ultimately had Moton Clubsports on the CSP car, we didn't have the big front swaybar that we were starting out with on the DP car, so spring rates were a bit of a guess.
This new car came to the team as an automatic with 98,000 miles. While we knew that it started and drove, we had no clue as to how it would run on an autocross course. Keep in mind we were also running the stock ECU that still thought the car was an automatic.
Ron took the first run in the car, and while it seemed to be a very good start on the handling, the power was abysmal. Apparently the ECU had some confusion with not seeing the automatic transmission, and didn't accelerate very well at all. Nevertheless, we continued to run the car all day, and as the day went on, it got better, though still not anywhere near what we knew was possible from our time in our old CSP car. All in all though, it turned out to be a very promising first outing as Ron was able to take 3rd overall in the Pax standings, and in afternoon fun runs, was able to run the same time as Jim Daniels, who took 2nd at the 2010 Solo Nationals in DP!
While this turned out to be a very respectable start to Bruiser's autocross career, we learned that there was still work to be done. First off, obviously we needed to address the power issue, or more to the point, the lack of power issue. Come Monday, we shot off an e-mail to Joe of DP Tune in Texas to see what he could do for us, as the ECU was definitely the main factor. He was able to source a manual transmission ECU for us and reflash it to the MX-5 Cup specs. Joe is a great guy to deal with. Not only does he know his stuff on these ECUs, but he was very accommodating on getting me a new ECU to use the following weekend. In addition to the more aggressive tune, Joe increased the rev limit and "unlocked" it so that the key was no longer required to be in the ignition. We plugged the new ECU in at the event the following weekend, took out the key and it started right up. However, as before.... we forgot that there was still a steering wheel lock, so the key was still needed for the time being! Ron ran the car across the parking lot and while it seemed a little more lively, it didn't become obvious until the first run of the course. As it turns out, the automatic ECU was really slowing the car down. The new, improved ECU felt like it gained us 30 horsepower!
Our second issue was that the car had a lot of understeer. Again, we had a much bigger front swaybar with our new Tri-:Point speedway style bar, and our spring rates had around the same spread that our CSP car did that also had some initial corner entry understeer. The fix here would be to increase the rear spring rates. We decided that at the same time we should take the opportunity to go with shorter springs. So, we ordered up a new set of Hypercoil 6" x 500lb springs. The only problem with this was that the shorter springs were only available in this spring rate with 60mm or 2.25" ID. Theoretically this shouldn't be a problem, but our adapter between the helper springs and the main springs were made for the 2.5" ID springs that we originally purchased. We therefore needed to grind down the adapter to fit. This would have been fairly easy at home with a grinder, but we were at the event site. It took awhile, but with a file in hand, we were able to to do the work required, and were able to lower the rear of the car an inch. While it still had more rake than we preferred, it was a step in the right direction, and looked much better.
As you could tell, the car was in nearly ready status as of the last post, but it was missing at least one major item.... Suspension.
I had ordered up a set of Motons between Christmas and New Years, 2010. Normal lead time was 4-6 weeks, but ultimately that turned into a few months due to work stoppages in Holland where they are built. I finally got to the point where I wasn't willing to wait any longer as the season had already started, so I change my order over to AST.
AST builds a very high end shock that is available in many levels. I chose to go with the 5200 series shocks as they are double adjustable, which in my opinion is very necessary for tuning the MX-5. They are beautiful shocks, with aluminum bodies, monotube setup, and remote canisters for adjusting the compression.
![]() |
| AST 5200 front shock with remote reservoir |
Along with the AST shocks, I utilized spherical bearing top hats in the front. They came with Hypercoil helper springs and main springs. The helper spring's primary purpose is to keep the springs seated when the car is jacked up. The springs that came with the coilovers were 2.5" ID, with 7"x700lb fronts and 7"x400lb rears.
![]() |
| AST coilovers with 7" front and rear springs |
Unfortunately, once I put everything together and bolted them to the car, I had the front of the car it it's highest setting and the rear at it's lowest and had a huge rake to the car (the rear was about 2" higher than the front and not really much lower than it was with the stock shocks/springs. As it turns out, the rears needed more threads on the shocks themselves to get the car down where it should be.
| May 12, 2011 - First alignment at Fordahl Motorsports |
The grand unveiling of the car went quite well, with lots of people excited to see the car, not the least of which was Bauerspeed Racing itself!
Of course, this was to be the first actual shakedown of the car, so while hopes were high, there was also much trepidation. Bauerspeed Racing had previously run an MX-5 in CSP, so we had a good amount of knowledge from that, but that car started as a brand new, off the lot car, so it was a known quantity as far as the running gear itself. In addition, while we ultimately had Moton Clubsports on the CSP car, we didn't have the big front swaybar that we were starting out with on the DP car, so spring rates were a bit of a guess.
This new car came to the team as an automatic with 98,000 miles. While we knew that it started and drove, we had no clue as to how it would run on an autocross course. Keep in mind we were also running the stock ECU that still thought the car was an automatic.
![]() |
| Oregon Region SCCA #4 - 5/14/2011 |
While this turned out to be a very respectable start to Bruiser's autocross career, we learned that there was still work to be done. First off, obviously we needed to address the power issue, or more to the point, the lack of power issue. Come Monday, we shot off an e-mail to Joe of DP Tune in Texas to see what he could do for us, as the ECU was definitely the main factor. He was able to source a manual transmission ECU for us and reflash it to the MX-5 Cup specs. Joe is a great guy to deal with. Not only does he know his stuff on these ECUs, but he was very accommodating on getting me a new ECU to use the following weekend. In addition to the more aggressive tune, Joe increased the rev limit and "unlocked" it so that the key was no longer required to be in the ignition. We plugged the new ECU in at the event the following weekend, took out the key and it started right up. However, as before.... we forgot that there was still a steering wheel lock, so the key was still needed for the time being! Ron ran the car across the parking lot and while it seemed a little more lively, it didn't become obvious until the first run of the course. As it turns out, the automatic ECU was really slowing the car down. The new, improved ECU felt like it gained us 30 horsepower!
Our second issue was that the car had a lot of understeer. Again, we had a much bigger front swaybar with our new Tri-:Point speedway style bar, and our spring rates had around the same spread that our CSP car did that also had some initial corner entry understeer. The fix here would be to increase the rear spring rates. We decided that at the same time we should take the opportunity to go with shorter springs. So, we ordered up a new set of Hypercoil 6" x 500lb springs. The only problem with this was that the shorter springs were only available in this spring rate with 60mm or 2.25" ID. Theoretically this shouldn't be a problem, but our adapter between the helper springs and the main springs were made for the 2.5" ID springs that we originally purchased. We therefore needed to grind down the adapter to fit. This would have been fairly easy at home with a grinder, but we were at the event site. It took awhile, but with a file in hand, we were able to to do the work required, and were able to lower the rear of the car an inch. While it still had more rake than we preferred, it was a step in the right direction, and looked much better.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





























